ReviewJournal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
Ceramide-Infused Skin Barrier for Use Following Ostomy Surgery: A Narrative Review of Available Data.
Review in Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review summarizes published data regarding a ceramide-infused skin barrier intended for use in patients who have undergone creation of a fecal or urinary ostomy (colostomy, ileostomy, urostomy). A randomized clinical trial (ADVOCATE) found that the mean total ostomy-related costs of care over a 12-week period were 14% lower among patients randomized to the ceramide-infused skin barrier than among control barriers. Study findings further suggested that the ceramide-infused skin barrier reduced the incidence of peristomal skin complications. Economic models, based in part on findings from the ADVOCATE trial, suggest that the ceramide-infused skin barrier is cost-effective versus other ostomy barriers from a per-patient perspective, and it is associated with cost savings for payers from a population perspective. Information from several studies, both randomized trials and observational studies, indicate quality-of-life benefits and relatively high levels of patient satisfaction associated with the ceramide-infused skin barrier. Collectively, available data indicate that, relative to other skin barriers, the ceramide-infused skin barrier is a cost-effective and cost-saving option that also provides quality-of-life benefits for patients who have undergone ostomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.