Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41778501›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

The Changing Landscape of Second Primary Malignancies in Multiple Myeloma: A SEER Population-Based Study Between Two Therapeutic Eras.

Weixiang Lu, Xiaoshan Huang, Shengyu Tian, Xiaojie Liang, Guanzhou Ke, Jia Guo, Qingqing Li, Yuquan Huang, Yang Li, Baiwei Luo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Weixiang LuDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-1034-7425
Xiaoshan HuangDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5492-9489
Shengyu TianDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaojie LiangDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guanzhou KeSchool of Computing and Information Systems, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.
Jia GuoDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qingqing LiDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuquan HuangDepartment of Pathology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yang LiSchool of Obstetrics and Pediatrics, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Baiwei LuoDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bingyu LinDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan XuDepartment of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Liang WangDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-914X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionThe introduction of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents has significantly improved the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in MM survivors has raised widespread concern.MethodsThis population-based retrospective study using the SEER database analyzed data from 26,869 MM patients (1990-2021) to evaluate changes in SPMs across two therapeutic eras. Patients were stratified into two therapeutic eras based on the year of MM diagnosis: Era-1 (1990-2005; n=12,858) and Era-2 (2006-2021; n=14,011).ResultsAmong 1,346 MM patients who developed SPMs, 670 were in Era-1 and 676 in Era-2. The 15-year cumulative incidence of SPMs was significantly higher in Era-2 (7.7% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001), an increase driven mainly by solid tumors (6.90% vs. 4.10%, P < 0.001) with no significant change in second hematological malignancies (0.84% vs. 0.67%, P = 0.13). Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) analysis revealed elevated hematological malignancy risk in Era-2 (SIR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.49-1.96). Median time to SPM was shorter in Era-2 (43.5 vs. 59 months, P < 0.001). Notably, 80% of SPMs in Era-2 occurred within 90 months of MM diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) of SPM patients showed no significant improvement in Era-2 compared to Era-1. Within each diagnostic era, patients who developed SPMs exhibited longer overall survival than those with MM alone; however, this reflects survivor bias, as SPMs can only develop in patients who survive long enough after the initial MM diagnosis. No significant OS differences were observed among SPM patients by race or gender.ConclusionsThe risk of SPMs in MM survivors has significantly increased, and the latency between MM diagnosis and the onset of SPMs was shorter in the Era-2, highlighting the need for enhanced cancer surveillance in MM survivors.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSEER Programcumulative incidencemultiple myelomaprognosissecond primary malignanciestherapeutic era

Identifiers

PMID41778501
PMCPMC12961105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.