ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Treatment Monitoring and Outcome Prediction in Invasive Aspergillosis Using Immunologic Markers.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive aspergillosis (IA) is a leading cause of mortality despite antifungal therapy. Current biomarkers for treatment monitoring and outcome prediction are limited, with host biomarkers showing potential in other fungal diseases but not in IA yet.
methodsIn this ECMM multicenter study, we prospectively evaluated a cohort of 51 patients with probable or proven IA with underlying hematological malignancies. Serial serum samples, collected over a 3-week period, were analyzed using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel. Differential expression analyses and survival analysis for outcome prediction were performed.
resultsEarly after treatment, all differentially expressed proteins were upregulated in patients showing clinical improvement compared with those with worsening disease, with the exception of CCL23. Multiple proteins significantly correlated with the need to switch from primary to salvage antifungal therapy. For late treatment response, matrix metalloproteinase-10 (MMP-10) emerged as predictor, with consistently lower expression during clinical improvement during Weeks 2 and 3. Moreover, low-serum concentrations of CXCL6 at Week 2 and MMP-10 at Week 3 were associated with higher survival probability.
conclusionsThe dynamics of immune markers across disease states may help predicting responses to antifungal treatment. Future studies should establish their usefulness in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.