ReviewReproduction & fertility2026
The gap between prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea and available treatment strategies.
Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abstract: Primary dysmenorrhea is the cramping pain in the lower abdomen usually before or during menstruation. Although dysmenorrhea affects young girls and women of all ages, the etiology and treatment options are sparse and have limitations. Through a review of the existing literature, we document the history and elaborate on the mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatments related to dysmenorrhea. Based on cross-sectional studies, primary dysmenorrhea is a common issue affecting many women of reproductive age, often leading to absenteeism, and interfering with daily activities. Treatments such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives have been developed; however, they are not always effective, highlighting a gap between societal needs and available treatment options. To uncover the mechanisms underlying painful contractions, in vitro systems and animal models have been used, but they have limitations and do not fully replicate the condition, highlighting the gap between the prevalence of dysmenorrhea and our understanding of the etiology of dysmenorrhea and treatment options. A better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate uterine contractions through development of new model systems is needed to identify novel treatment approaches for dysmenorrhea. Lay summary: Primary dysmenorrhea or menstrual cramps are a common issue affecting many women of reproductive age, often leading to absenteeism, and interfering with daily activities. In our review, we highlight that treatments such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral contraceptives have been developed; however, they are not always effective, highlighting a gap between societal needs and available treatment options. We also note that to uncover the mechanisms underlying painful contractions, in vitro systems and animal models have been used, but they have limitations and do not fully replicate the condition. Finally, we suggest that a better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate uterine contractions is needed to identify novel treatment approaches for dysmenorrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.