ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
Strategies and Educational Approaches to Colonoscopy Training: A Scoping Review.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning colonoscopy is challenging for inexperienced endoscopists, with competence typically achieved through observation, verbal instruction and hands-on clinical training.
objectiveVarious non-clinical teaching models have been developed and are used globally. This scoping review identifies these methods and evaluates their learning outcomes.
designFollowing the PRISMA-ScR framework, MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for English-language articles published from 2012 onward. Two reviewers screened eligible studies, resulting in a final selection of relevant full-text articles. The review addressed (1) which teaching methods/tools have been tested for endoscopy training and (2) which methods yield better colonoscopy performance outcomes.
resultsFrom 217 articles, 31 met inclusion criteria. The most common teaching methods were virtual reality (VR) models and physical models, both within and across studies. Other studies included box models, animal models, real-time feedback devices, traditional/verbal instruction models, didactic models and two-person colonoscopy models. Across all studies, participants ranged widely in experience from medical students to experienced specialists, with the effectiveness of training modalities closely tied to the participants' baseline experience.
conclusionDespite the variety of colonoscopy teaching methods, there is limited comparative research on their effectiveness both alone and when integrated with the traditional/verbal learning model. Prior experience appears to be a clear predictor of any model's potential effectiveness. As such, it appears important to tailor any colonoscopy training method to a learner's experience level to optimise skill acquisition and clinical readiness. Further research would benefit from a direct comparison of all teaching methods across a range of user skill sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.