ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025
Short and long term central peripherally inserted catheters in hematological malignancy patients: clinical outcomes and safety. Single centre experience.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterise the population and describe the complications in patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent implantation of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or midline catheter (MC) for the administration of chemotherapy or oncologic support. Methods: The retrospective descriptive study included patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent PICC or MC implantation between July 2022 and 2024. All patients are part of the institution-based prospective observational Evidence - Verification - Analysis study. Variables related to device type were obtained from the vascular access and infection control group databases. Frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables, and medians and interquartile ranges were used for numerical variables. Event rates per 1,000 days were calculated for complications. Results: 156 patients with 249 events were included. All devices were high-flow and bi-lumen, the most common indication was chemotherapy administration, and the most common site was brachial. The median days in use for lymphoma and acute leukaemia were 67.5 and 24 days, respectively. The rates of catheter-associated thrombosis and catheter-associated bloodstream infection were 3.2% and 3.7%, respectively. The rates of catheter-related venous thrombosis per 1,000 catheter days and catheter-related bloodstream infection per 1,000 catheter days were 0.31 and 0.83, respectively. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach, thorough initial venous assessment, a strong support network, adherence to care protocols and continuous patient education have helped to reduce variability in care and lower complication rates at our institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.