ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Scalable and objective wound infection screening from clinical images using deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wound infection is a common and clinically significant complication that can delay healing, increase healthcare costs, and contribute to inappropriate antimicrobial use. Rapid, objective, and scalable screening tools are urgently needed, particularly in resource-limited or non-specialist clinical settings. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based framework for automated wound infection detection using clinical wound images, with a focus on improving diagnostic consistency and supporting public health-oriented wound management. Methods: A dataset of 4,000 diverse clinical wound images was used to train and evaluate multiple deep learning models. The Swin Transformer architecture was compared with conventional convolutional neural networks. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and F1-score. To evaluate real-world applicability, model predictions were further compared with assessments made by non-specialist clinicians. Results: The Swin Transformer outperformed conventional convolutional neural networks, achieving an accuracy of 0.9025 (95% CI: 0.8695-0.9279), an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9546, and an F1-score of 0.9042. Compared with non-specialist clinicians, the model reduced diagnostic variability and enabled earlier and more consistent recognition of wound infections. Conclusion: Deep learning applied to clinical wound images provides a scalable and objective approach for wound infection screening. Such tools have the potential to support earlier detection, reduce diagnostic variability, and improve wound management and antimicrobial stewardship, particularly in public health and resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.