ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Social prescribing for refugee populations: a protocol for a rapid realist review of international evidence.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social prescribing for refugee populations: a rapid realist review of international evidence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social prescribing addresses complex individual health and social needs through person-centered referral from healthcare into community settings, supporting wellbeing and integrated care. While evidence for majority populations continues to expand, no review has yet synthesized evidence specifically for refugee populations, despite this group facing profound social and systemic barriers. As such, this protocol defines the research objectives for a rapid realist review that will identify what approaches to social interventions work for refugee populations, for whom they are effective, and under which circumstances. Methods: A rapid realist review will be conducted to identify relevant evidence from both social prescribing interventions and social capital-based interventions (where comparably operationalized), published 2014-2024. The date range reflects recent expansion of both social prescribing interest and forced migration research, with earlier intervention being less commonly documented. Six databases will be searched (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycInfo), complemented by extensive supplementary search strategies. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract data using piloted criteria. Synthesis: Realist analysis will map included evidence to identify intervention concepts, methodologies, populations, settings, delivery structures, and evaluation measures. This mapping will be used to identify and group families of interventions that function comparably and to develop program theories using if-then logic (statements theorizing how social prescribing programs may be effective using a context-mechanism-outcome configuration). Synthesis results will include multiple products to transparently evidence the working process of the review and to illustrate the final results. Dissemination: Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal, with a briefing paper distributed to relevant research networks. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PTKDX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.