ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Implementation of India's largest sentinel surveillance for meningitis: an exploratory qualitative analysis of the facilitators and challenges in this sentinel site network.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meningitis remains a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in India, with Methods: An exploratory qualitative evaluation was conducted to identify facilitators and challenges faced during implementation of the surveillance network. Using multistage purposive sampling, 15 study sites across six zones of India were selected, representing National Apex Laboratories, Regional Reference Laboratories, and Clinical Recruitment Sites. Twenty-five key informant interviews were conducted with project implementers from both high- and low-performing sites. Audio-recorded data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed using a framework approach. Findings: The project team encountered challenges throughout the implementation of the surveillance network, including case identification, obtaining informed consent-particularly from illiterate populations-and incomplete clinical or vaccination histories. Difficulties were also noted in CSF collection, storage, transport, and delayed laboratory reporting. Data management issues arose from manual CRF entry, along with interdepartmental coordination problems due to frequent staff transfers and the need for repeated training. Dependence on external supplies for reagents and primers posed additional limitations. These challenges were addressed through root cause analysis, timely corrective and preventive actions, regular trainings, improved supervision, and enhanced communication via SOPs and digital platforms. Key facilitators for successful implementation included stakeholder motivation, capacity building, and strengthened coordination mechanisms. Interpretation: The successful implementation of this nationwide laboratory surveillance despite multiple challenges offers valuable lessons for future initiatives. A decentralized sentinel laboratory network with integrated data management and strong central coordination is crucial for effective monitoring. Based on this experience, establishing similar surveillance systems is recommended for countries to track circulating pneumococcal serotypes and support evidence-based vaccine decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.