ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Machine learning-based prediction of intensive care unit admission in COVID-19 patients presenting with mild respiratory failure.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies applying machine learning to predict severe respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients have shown inconsistent results due to variations in study populations and predictor variables. This study aimed to predict intensive care unit admission and identify key predictive factors. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with COVID-19 who presented with mild respiratory failure, most of whom received oxygen via a mask or nasal cannula. Eight machine learning algorithms-XGBoost, support vector machines, neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, decision trees, logistic regression, and naïve Bayes-were applied to predict intensive care unit admission. Results: A total of 392 patients (63.5% male, mean age, 55.0 ± 15.3 years) were included in the study. During follow-up, 80 patients (20.4%) required intensive care unit admission. Among them, 320 (81.6%) received steroid therapy, 301 (76.8%) underwent pulse steroid therapy, and 76 (19%) had been vaccinated. The multilayer perceptron, XGBoost, and radial basis function support vector machine models achieved the best overall performance based on ROC-AUC and accuracy values (ROC-AUC: 0.75, 0.70, and 0.71; accuracy: 0.79, 0.79, and 0.79, respectively). The strongest predictors of intensive care unit admission were low lymphocyte count on the first day, as well as high age, ferritin, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and computed tomography score. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can reliably predict intensive care unit admission in COVID-19 patients with mild respiratory failure. These models identified key clinical and laboratory factors that may facilitate early risk stratification and guide treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.