ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficient and explainable histopathology for cancer detection using dual-teacher distillation and integrated gradients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The timely and accurate histopathological diagnosis plays a critical role in effective treatment. Manual interpretation of histology slides is time consuming and requires considerable expertise. To address these challenges, this study introduces a two-teacher one-student (2T-1S) knowledge distillation framework for gastric cancer classification using the GasHisSDB dataset. The framework leverages DenseNet-121 and ResNet-50 as teacher networks to guide a lightweight MobileNet-V2 student. This approach provided high accuracy with significantly reduced computational cost. Experiments on multi-resolution patches (80 × 80, 120 × 120, and 160 × 160) show that the MobileNet-V2 student achieved accuracies of 95.78%, 97.46%, and 98.33%, respectively. Also, the teacher model DenseNet-121 achieved the accuracies of 96.44%, 98.75% and 98.19% and the ResNet-50 teacher reached 96.63%, 97.87% and 98.31% respectively. In addition, the student network was more than thirty times smaller and nearly twice as fast during inference. This fast light-weight model is well-suited for real-time inference on resource-constrained devices. Integrated Gradients were applied to explain the model was paying attention to actual features and focus on meaningful regions like nuclei clusters and gland boundaries. Compared with many existing techniques this framework act as balance trade-off between accuracy, speed and interpretability. This balance positions the framework as a viable tool for digital pathology workflows and further refinement could extend its utility to clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.