Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777998›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Lessons Learnt From COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: The Role of Culturally Concordant Providers.

Kalpana P Padala, Ivy McGeeBlanks, Prasad R Padala

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kalpana P PadalaGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, USA.
Ivy McGeeBlanksPrimary Care Service, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, USA.
Prasad R PadalaGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine uptake during the pandemic had varied widely within the US with the lowest rates of vaccine uptake in predominantly southern states. While vaccine hesitancy is prevalent in the public, higher rates of vaccine hesitancy are seen among African Americans and Hispanics. The discrepant vaccine hesitancy is salient since minorities have been particularly hit hard by the pandemic with disproportionately higher rates of infection and morbidity. Recent data show disparities in vaccination rates among minorities in some parts of the US showing White residents to be twice as likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine compared to their Black counterparts. This perspective discusses factors related to higher vaccine hesitancy among minorities and outlines the experience of a culturally concordant physician champion improving vaccine uptake at an academic medical center. Lessons from the last pandemic might help us better prepare for future ones and cope with a changing landscape that fosters political influence on vaccine uptake. Based on the lessons, we propose a new model for vaccine hesitancy, the 6C model.

Indexed as

covid-19minoritiesoperation warp speedvaccine hesitancyworld health organization

Identifiers

PMID41777998
PMCPMC12952697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.