ArticleCureus2026
Spermatic Cord Hydrocele: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although hydrocele is one of the most common inguinoscrotal pathologies, spermatic cord hydrocele (SCH) is a rare entity. Its development is attributed to the incomplete closure of the processus vaginalis, resulting in a collection of fluid that may either communicate with or become encysted along the spermatic cord. Despite its rarity, it has been documented in children and, more rarely, in adults. As it presents with an inguinoscrotal swelling separate from the testis, the encysted variant of SCH poses a diagnostic dilemma when differentiating it from an irreducible inguinal hernia; however, its nature of being transilluminant, along with a complete clinical examination, aids in diagnosis. This study, conducted at a peripheral tertiary care center in northern India, aimed to describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and surgical management of SCHs across different age groups, highlighting the importance of thorough clinical examination and ultrasonography in distinguishing this entity from inguinal hernia. We report six cases - two adult patients and four pediatric patients - with SCH, including five with the encysted variant and one with the communicating type, all of whom were managed surgically at our institute. The inclusion of both pediatric and adult cases makes this case series unique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.