ArticleCureus2026
Comparative Study of Safety and Outcomes of Malecot and Pigtail Catheters in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrostomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePercutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) is a vital urological intervention to relieve urinary tract obstructions caused by stones, malignancies, or strictures, which can compromise renal function. PCN also facilitates urinary diversion in cases of leaks or fistulas. Catheter choice, such as Malecot (silicone) or pigtail (polyurethane), impacts outcomes, with complications like dislodgement and obstruction. This study compares the safety, efficacy, and patient outcomes of Malecot versus pigtail catheters in ultrasound-guided PCN. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective observational comparative analysis was conducted at the Department of Urology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India, from December 2022 to May 2025, involving 548 patients (248 Malecot, 300 pigtail) undergoing ultrasound-guided PCN for urinary obstruction due to urolithiasis, malignancy, or strictures. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data, including complication rates (per Clavien-Dindo classification), catheter displacement, and reintervention rates, were compared. Procedures utilized the Seldinger technique under ultrasound guidance. Statistical significance was assessed using p-values.
resultsBaseline demographics (age, sex, and hydronephrosis grade) were comparable, though the pigtail group had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p=0.038). Malecot catheters showed superior performance in draining pus-laden obstructions (114/248 vs. 88/300, p<0.001), attributed to larger diameters (10f predominant, p<0.001). Pigtail catheters had higher displacement rates (15% vs. 6%, p<0.01) and reintervention rates (59% vs. 26%, p<0.001). Complication rates were similar (p=0.076), predominantly low-grade. Procedure times and hospital stays were equivalent.
conclusionIn ultrasound-guided PCN, Malecot catheters were associated with lower displacement and reintervention rates than pigtail catheters in managing complex urinary obstructions, particularly pyonephrosis. These findings suggest a potential role for Malecot catheters in selected high-risk cases, though larger, multicenter studies are needed to refine catheter selection protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.