ReviewCureus2026
Dysbaric Osteonecrosis in Divers: A Narrative Review With a Systematic Literature Search of Pathophysiology, Prevalence, Clinical Features, and Screening.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysbaric osteonecrosis (DON) is a form of bone injury that occurs when nitrogen bubbles form during rapid decompression, leading to impaired blood flow and subsequent bone necrosis. Although DON was first described more than a century ago, it remains underdiagnosed, particularly among unregulated diving populations. This review aims to summarize available data on the prevalence, anatomical distribution, clinical presentation, and diagnostic methods of DON in divers, while also identifying research gaps and evaluating proposed pathophysiological mechanisms. A literature search was conducted across Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Twelve studies (seven prevalence studies and five case-based reports) were included based on relevance and sample size. Reported prevalence varied widely, with unregulated artisanal divers showing markedly higher rates (up to 76.9%) compared with regulated populations, such as military divers (0%-3.125%). Plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the most commonly used diagnostic modalities. DON predominantly involved long bones, particularly the humeral and femoral heads, likely reflecting their terminal blood supply and susceptibility to ischemia. Type B (diaphyseal) lesions were typically incidental, whereas Type A (subchondral) lesions were more often symptomatic. Proposed pathophysiological mechanisms include thrombus formation secondary to adipocyte rupture and direct vascular obstruction by nitrogen bubbles. Although the role of prophylactic anticoagulation remains uncertain, elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels in some cases suggest a coagulative component. Studies relying primarily on radiography reported higher prevalence rates, likely reflecting detection bias rather than true disease burden, given the low sensitivity of X-ray imaging for early DON. MRI, considered the diagnostic gold standard, was predominantly used in controlled or regulated settings. DON is a preventable complication of decompression exposure. Adherence to established diving protocols and early screening using sensitive imaging modalities are essential. Further prospective studies and evaluation of emerging diagnostic tools, such as computed tomography (CT), are needed to improve detection, prevention, and overall diving safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.