Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777973›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Surgical Outcomes and Learning Curve of Robotic Single-Port Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Hysterectomy Using the Da Vinci Single-Port System.

Qiannan Yang, Daniel Y Lovell, Xiaoming Guan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiannan YangObstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Daniel Y LovellObstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Xiaoming GuanObstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to assess the surgical outcomes and learning curve of robotic single-port vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (RSP-vNOTES) for hysterectomy in benign gynecologic conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective observational analysis was conducted of 97 consecutively enrolled patients who underwent RSP-vNOTES hysterectomy using the da Vinci (single-port) SP system between December 2023 and July 2025 at a single tertiary care center.

resultsMedian procedural durations included a total operative time of 151 minutes, a port placement time of five minutes, a docking time of two minutes, a robotic console time of 78 minutes, and a hysterectomy time of 35 minutes. One case (1.0%) required conversion to a transumbilical single-incision robotic approach for management of diaphragmatic endometriosis after completion of the vaginal hysterectomy, rather than due to failure of the hysterectomy itself. Fourteen patients (14.4%) experienced perioperative complications. Cumulative sum analysis revealed that hysterectomy time stabilized after approximately 30 cases, while port placement and docking times plateaued after 43 and 37 cases, respectively.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that proficiency in RSP-vNOTES can be achieved with sequential case experience. RSP-vNOTES appears to be a safe and effective surgical approach for hysterectomy, including complex scenarios such as endometriosis. Proficiency is typically achieved after 30 cases, particularly among surgeons with prior experience in robotic-assisted single-site and vNOTES techniques.

Indexed as

da vinci sp platformhysterectomylearning curverobot-assistedvnotes

Identifiers

PMID41777973
PMCPMC12952751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.