ArticleCureus2026
Patient Recruitment Challenges in Academic Clinical Research: Perceptions and Experiences of Healthcare Professionals in a Teaching Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcademic clinical studies often struggle most with recruiting patients, and poor recruitment can delay projects and weaken the quality of study findings. Because recruitment in teaching hospitals is usually led by residents, faculty, and nurses, understanding what they experience on the ground is essential to improve enrolment in academic settings. This study explores the practical factors that facilitate or hinder patient enrolment as perceived by healthcare providers working in a tertiary care teaching hospital.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study among 120 healthcare professionals (40 residents, 40 faculty, and 40 nurses) in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Participants provided anonymous responses using a validated 10-item Likert scale instrument covering demographics and perceived recruitment barriers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, along with Chi-squared tests and ANOVA to compare differences across groups. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic coding.
resultsThe most commonly reported barriers were time constraints (99, 82.5%), difficulty explaining trials to patients (86, 71.6%), restrictive eligibility criteria (76, 63.3%), and administrative workload (43, 58.3%). Residents reported greater difficulty related to limited time during clinical duties, while faculty more often highlighted the burden of administrative tasks. Prior research training was associated with better confidence in explaining studies (p = 0.014) and greater motivation to actively identify eligible participants (p = 0.028). Thematic analysis grouped barriers into three broad domains: operational constraints, communication challenges, and limited institutional support. Participants suggested practical solutions, including appointing research coordinators, providing multilingual consent forms, and implementing structured training programs for research teams.
conclusionRecruitment barriers in academic clinical research are largely driven by operational pressures and communication gaps, compounded by limited organizational support. Strengthening institutional systems-particularly through dedicated support staff and structured training-may improve recruitment efficiency. Building research competencies among residents, nurses, and faculty could promote more ethical, timely, and effective patient enrolment in academic clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.