ArticleCureus2026
Secondary Syphilis as a Mimic of Cutaneous Small-Vessel Vasculitis: A Diagnostic Pitfall.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary syphilis is renowned for its ability to mimic a wide range of dermatologic and systemic diseases, including vasculitides. Misinterpretation of its cutaneous manifestations can delay appropriate therapy and expose patients to unnecessary immunosuppression. We report the case of a young female who presented with an acute, maculopapular, and annular rash initially affecting the upper body, including the back, chest, and upper limbs, followed by involvement of the lower body. It was preceded by redness and inflammation of her eyes. Initial clinical evaluation supported a diagnosis of cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis, and systemic vasculitis was strongly suspected. However, an extended history revealed recent unprotected sexual contact a few weeks before the symptoms started. Serologic testing demonstrated positive non-treponemal and treponemal tests consistent with secondary syphilis. The patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone, resulting in rapid resolution of the rash and improvement of her symptoms, with an appropriate decline in non-treponemal titers on follow-up. This case illustrates how secondary syphilis can present with a vasculitis-appearing rash clinically and underscores the need to include syphilis in the diagnostic workup of small-vessel vasculitis. Routine sexual history-taking and early syphilis serology in adults with an unexplained vasculitis rash may prevent diagnostic delay, inappropriate immunosuppression, and ongoing transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.