Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777908›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Structural Change in Adult Attachment Insecurity Through Transactional Analysis (TA) Developmental Collage Therapy: A Correlational Analysis.

Hidemi Nakano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hidemi NakanoClinical Psychology, Tokyo Clinical Psychology Counseling Academy, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternal Working Models (IWMs) are cognitive structures for simulating and predicting relational outcomes. While self-report attachment scales, such as the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR), effectively measure the emotional and behavioral dimensions of attachment, they do not directly assess the cognitive function that processes attachment-related information. Transactional Analysis (TA) offers the concept of the Adult ego state, defined as the capacity for reality testing and objective information processing. This study examined whether incorporating a measure of Adult ego state functioning alongside attachment assessment could reveal structural relationships not detected by attachment scales alone.

methodsA total of 31 healthy Japanese adults (7 males, 24 females; mean age = 51.8 years) completed the Experiences in Close Relationships - Generalized Other (ECR-GO) and Tokyo University Egogram (TEG3) before and after participating in a TA-based collage therapy program. Spearman correlations were calculated between ego state scores and attachment dimensions at both time points.

resultsAt baseline, a significant negative correlation was observed between Adult (A) and Anxiety, that is, negative self-image (

conclusionsThe inverse relationship between Adult ego state and attachment anxiety at baseline, and the subsequent change in correlation patterns, may suggest structural reorganization consistent with the TA concept of decontamination. This study is a correlation-based analysis and does not constitute causal inference. The concurrent use of cognitive function measures and attachment scales can reveal structural relationships that attachment measures alone cannot detect. Further research with larger samples is warranted.

Indexed as

adult attachmentcollage therapydecontaminationego statesinternal working model (iwm)mentalizationmental operating system (mental os)structural reorganizationtransactional analysis (ta)

Identifiers

PMID41777908
PMCPMC12951202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.