ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Treatment of Kimura disease with dupilumab: a case report and literature review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kimura disease is a benign chronic inflammatory condition characterized by painless subcutaneous masses, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and increased serum immunoglobulin E levels. The pathogenesis of KD remains unclear, however, more and more evidence suggests that type 2 inflammation may play an important role in KD. We present a case of a 19-year-old male who complained of masses behind both ears for two months, ultimately diagnosed as KD. He showed a partial response to the initial systemic corticosteroid therapy. However, after tapering the dosage of corticosteroids, the patient's symptoms did not improve, even with combined mycophenolate mofetil therapy. His symptoms worsened significantly after he discontinued treatment. Therefore, treatment with dupilumab was initiated at 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every two weeks. At week 20, the treatment was adjusted to 300 mg every four weeks for a duration of 32 weeks. The mass gradually reduced in size, accompanied by a progressive decrease in both the eosinophil count and IgE levels. These results show the significant efficacy of dupilumab in the management of KD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.