ArticleObesity pillars2026
The burden of bias: Patient experiences and providers' perspectives on weight bias.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weight bias is pervasive, occurs in a variety of contexts, and is associated with a range of suboptimal outcomes, including delays or avoidance in seeking health care, misdiagnosis, and denial of services. The aim of this study was to quantitatively describe the relationship between experiences of weight bias and eating behaviors of patients in a lifestyle medicine program and qualitatively describe healthcare providers' insights about weight bias. Methods: This study utilized an explanatory sequential design that drew on one-time survey data collected from 109 patients of a Plant-Based Lifestyle Medicine (PBLM) Program in New York City in 2019. Ordinary Least Squares and logistic regression models examined the association between weight bias and healthful plant-based eating and emotional eating after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Qualitative data come from asynchronous interviews with five healthcare providers from the PBLM program completed in 2024 which were analyzed using rapid coding. Results: Survey participants were on average 53 years old, 67.0% female, 68.6% Black, Indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC), and 56.2% reported experiencing weight bias. Weight bias was associated with 4.07 fewer points on the healthful plant-based eating measure (95%CI: 6.86, -1.27), and participants had 5.06 times the odds (95%CI: 1.76, 14.59) of emotional eating compared to those not reporting weight bias. Interview themes were: (1) Weight bias negatively influences patient lives, (2) Weight bias is negatively associated with patients' mental health, (3) Promising weight-inclusive approaches, and (4) Recommendations for providers to address weight bias. Conclusion: Experiences of weight bias were associated with suboptimal eating behaviors and poor mental health. Providers observed their patients experience harm in connection with weight bias, suggested weight-inclusive approaches, and identified recommendations that would mitigate weight bias in healthcare environments including routinely screening for weight bias, training providers on weight inclusive care, incorporating mental health services into care teams, and creating size inclusive spaces. This study demonstrates that weight bias is linked to deleterious outcomes and the importance of weight-inclusive care delivery and environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.