Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777803›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026

Validation of the confusion assessment method for intensive care.

Carla Cristina Nunes Teixeira Veiga, Paulo Alexandre Oliveira Marques, José Manuel Monteiro Dias, Amâncio António de Sousa Carvalho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carla Cristina Nunes Teixeira VeigaSpecialized Nurse in Critical Care, Local Health Unit of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Hospital of S. Pedro, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-3410
Paulo Alexandre Oliveira MarquesNursing School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6855-9634
José Manuel Monteiro DiasDepartment of the School of Health of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1767-6926
Amâncio António de Sousa CarvalhoDepartment of the School of Health of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-5312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Delirium is a common but frequently underdiagnosed complication in adult intensive care units (ICU), associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Early detection using validated tools is essential. This study aim to translate, adapt, and validate the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units flowsheet (CAM-ICU flowsheet) into European Portuguese. Methods: A methodological, cross-sectional, descriptive-correlational study was conducted in a northern Portuguese ICU. The CAM-ICU flowsheet was translated and back-translated, followed by expert validation. Forty-two adult ICU patients on invasive mechanical ventilation were assessed using the adapted tool by two trained observers. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using DSM-5 criteria as the gold standard. Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, kappa coefficient, and ROC curves. Results: Delirium was detected in 57.1 % of patients. The CAM-ICU flowsheet in European Portuguese demonstrated high interobserver agreement (κ=0.952), excellent sensitivity (100 %), and specificity (81.8-86.3 %). ROC AUC ranged from 0.909 to 0.932. The inattentiveness feature was the core for the presence or absence of delirium. Conclusions: The CAM-ICU flowsheet in European Portuguese was validated to assess delirium in nonverbal ICU patients on mechanical ventilation through this study and demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool.

Indexed as

deliriumdimensional measurement accuracyintensive care unitsmechanical ventilatorrisk assessment methodologiesvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID41777803
PMCPMC12952290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.