Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777796›Full record

ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Reframing livestock antimicrobial use as a global public good.

Alejandro Acosta, Francesco Nicolli, Rachel Dalton, Antonio Valcarce, Emmanuel Kabali, Alejandro Dorado Garcia, Carmen Bullon, Wondmagegn Tirkaso, Junxia Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alejandro AcostaAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Francesco NicolliAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Rachel DaltonAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Antonio ValcarceAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Emmanuel KabaliAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Alejandro Dorado GarciaAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Carmen BullonDevelopment Law Service, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Wondmagegn TirkasoAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Junxia SongAnimal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global antimicrobial use in livestock is projected to rise over coming decades, accelerating antimicrobial resistance and eroding antimicrobial effectiveness. Although stewardship efforts have expanded, they remain largely national and voluntary, even as resistance dynamics propagate across borders. This paper reframes antimicrobial effectiveness in livestock systems as a global public good, defined by non-rivalry, non-excludability, and transboundary spillovers. Under this framing, persistent overuse reflects governance and market failures that misalign local production incentives with global welfare losses. Drawing on global public good theory within a One Health perspective, the paper develops an integrated stewardship framework that clarifies why aggregating national actions underdelivers. The framework links four mutually reinforcing pillars: international governance and accountability, incentive-compatible economic instruments, sustainable and equitable financing, and farm-level adoption enablers. Together, these pillars translate shared global objectives into national stewardship while preserving access for animal health needs, thereby supporting livestock productivity, food security, and public health.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial EffectivenessAntimicrobial ResistanceAntimicrobial StewardshipAntimicrobial UseGlobal Public GoodsLivestockOne Health

Identifiers

PMID41777796
PMCPMC12950407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.