Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777785›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Cognitive linguistics approach to the representation of knowledge contents in college English textbooks.

Li Zhang, Zaishu Mo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Li ZhangSchool of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zaishu MoSchool of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a metaphor-based textbook analysis model from a macroscopic perspective and abstracts it with the "Source-Path-Goal (SPG)" image schema. Seeking new insights from cognitive linguistic theory, as well as conceptual metaphor theory (CMT), this research probes into the source, path, and goal of the metaphorical representation of knowledge contents in a series of college English textbooks in China. With the construction of a self-built textbook corpus and the aid of an online corpus annotation tool, qualitative content analysis was carried out to uncover the metaphorical representations in the textbook texts and tasks. Findings show that first, the conceptual metaphors in the texts and the metaphorical analogical reasoning in tasks are considered in the analysis model as "Source." Second, structured design including the "hourglass" pattern in the unit design is the "Path" of knowledge representation in the textbooks. Third, the functions of these metaphorical representations are discussed as the "goal" of the knowledge representations in the textbooks, which is the realization of competence development as the textbooks' teaching objectives. Since conceptual metaphor theory puts forward a universality of metaphors, the case study is not only typical in the Chinese context but also potentially informative beyond it.

Indexed as

analysis modelcognitive linguisticscollege English textbooksconceptual metaphor theorytextbook analysis

Identifiers

PMID41777785
PMCPMC12950758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.