ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Development of a tool for assessing awareness of consequences of suicide.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a tool for assessing awareness of consequences of suicide.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The ways in which individuals consider the potential impact of suicide on their life goals (i.e., consequences of suicide) may influence their suicidal ideation and/or behavior, but no measures exist for assessing awareness of consequences of suicide. A new measure is needed to ensure reliable and valid measurement which then enables accurate testing of hypotheses regarding consequences of suicide. The current study aimed to develop and refine a new tool for assessing awareness of potential consequences of suicide (Awareness Assessment Tool; AAT). Design: Multiple stages of AAT development involved analysis of qualitative data from two sets of interviews. Methods: Interviews with 12 participants who had contemplated or attempted suicide were analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis (TA) to evaluate potential AAT items (Stage 1), followed by initial item development (Stage 2). Cognitive interviews to evaluate the AAT were then conducted with nine individuals with experience of suicidal ideation and/or behavior and analyzed using TA (Stage 3), followed by further AAT refinement (Stage 4). Results: The following themes were identified at Stage 1: "The interview as an acceptable and helpful experience" and "The relationship between one's mindset and ability to remember experiences of suicide." Stage 3 analysis generated the following themes: "Limitations of the AAT design"; "The AAT as an acceptable measure of a potentially helpful idea"; "The importance of accounting for failure to reach goals"; "Psychological processes regarding the potential impact of suicide captured by the AAT"; "The importance of assessing short-term goals." In Stage 4, the phrasing and length of AAT items were refined, some items were added, and improvements were made to the interviewer instructions and prompts in the AAT. Conclusion: Patterns of responding to AAT items were highlighted and refinements were made to improve the AAT. Overall, the AAT was experienced as acceptable and sometimes helpful, with demonstrable potential for use in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.