Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777776›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

Intervals as musical fingerprints: perceptual and pedagogical insights-a scoping review.

Mustafa Kendüzler

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mustafa KendüzlerDepartment of Music Education, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception and training of musical intervals form a central foundation for pitch cognition and musical understanding within solfege education. This scoping review maps the existing literature on interval training, emphasizing the interplay between perceptual mechanisms, pedagogical modeling, and instructional design. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, systematic searches were conducted across three academic platforms-ERIC, Google Scholar, and JSTOR-using combinations of the keywords "interval training," "solfege," "pitch perception," and "music education." Thirty-five peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were analyzed, while historical and theoretical sources (1889-2009) were also considered to contextualize the pedagogical and cognitive development of interval training. Thematic synthesis identified three overarching domains: (1) perceptual-cognitive mechanisms underlying interval recognition, tonal awareness, and auditory feedback; (2) pedagogical models integrating auditory, visual, and kinesthetic modalities in solfege instruction; and (3) instructional frameworks promoting pitch stability, long-term learning, and vocal-motor integration. Collectively, the reviewed evidence suggests that structured interval training enhances pitch discrimination, strengthens the mapping between perception and vocal production, and provides a sustainable foundation for music learning. By linking perceptual cognition with pedagogical practice, this study contributes to a broader understanding of how interval-based training supports both the psychological and educational dimensions of musical development.

Indexed as

auditory perceptioninterval trainingmusic pedagogypitch cognitionsolfege

Identifiers

PMID41777776
PMCPMC12950661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.