ArticleERJ open research2026
Factors affecting clinical trial participation in people with interstitial lung disease: a qualitative study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials are the best method for evaluating new treatments for people with interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recruitment in ILD clinical trials is often challenging. Certain trial characteristics may influence willingness to participate but this has not been investigated in people with ILD. This study aims to identify the factors that influence participation in clinical trials in people with ILD. Methods: This is a qualitative study using thematic analysis. Participants with ILD were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia between 2023 and 2024. Interviews were conducted over the phone, recorded and transcribed. The study was approved by the Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (598/22). Results: 17 participants with mild-to-moderate ILD were included. Overarching themes were: 1) reasons for participation, including development of new treatments, acceptable burden of participation and positive relationship with the research team; 2) reasons for refusing participation, consisting of disruption to daily life including financial burden, impact on health and uncertainty of benefits; and 3) experience when participating, including lack of communication and poor relationship with the research team. Participants described positive experiences (care and support from the research team) and negative experiences (discontinuation of treatment, insufficient information on trial outcomes) of trial participation. Discussion: People with ILD prefer trials that offer clear information and minimise disruption to their daily routines. A unique finding in this population is the importance placed on communication and support from the research team, as well as the desire to receive feedback about the trial's outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.