ArticleERJ open research2026
Patient-reported dyspnoea predicts six-fold increased hospital mortality.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients can report respiratory discomfort (dyspnoea) on a 0-10 scale. Patients reporting dyspnoea at admission have a four-fold risk of in-hospital death. We asked whether assessing dyspnoea throughout hospitalisation identifies additional patients at risk of death or other poor outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of non-intensive care unit patients at a tertiary care hospital. On each shift, bedside nurses documented patients' pain and dyspnoea ratings. We tested associations with inpatient mortality, 2-year mortality and other outcomes. Results: We evaluated 9785 admissions; 18% of patients reported dyspnoea at admission and 10% developed post-admission dyspnoea. Patients with post-admission-onset dyspnoea had six-fold greater odds of death during hospitalisation (OR 6.0, 95% CI 4.2-8.5, p<0.0001) Conclusions: In contrast to pain, both admission dyspnoea and post-admission-onset dyspnoea were associated with substantially increased odds of poor patient outcomes during hospitalisation and following discharge. Documenting dyspnoea throughout hospitalisation provides a powerful alarm of clinical compromise that may warrant additional attention and outpatient follow-up.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.