Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Frequency and Predictors of Positive Follow-up Blood Cultures in Patients with Streptococcal Bacteremia.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for streptococcal bacteremia are infrequently positive and may not provide sufficient clinical impact to justify the time and resources expended for their routine use. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of and risk factors for positive FUBCs in patients with streptococcal bacteremia and to compare clinical outcomes among patients with or without positive FUBCs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed hospitalized patients with streptococcal bacteremia from September 2023 to June 2024 within a multisite health system. Patients ≥18 years old with ≥1 positive blood culture for a Results: We included 454 patients, with 48 (10.6%) having positive FUBCs. The rate of positivity ranged from 0% for Conclusions: Positive FUBCs were infrequent for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.