Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777690›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Rapid assessment of phytoplankton assemblages using Next Generation Sequencing and Barcode of Life Data System: a widely applicable HAB-ID toolkit for detecting and monitoring biodiversity loss and harmful algal blooms.

Natalia V Ivanova, L Cynthia Watson, Jérôme Comte, Kyrylo Bessonov, Arusyak Abrahamyan, Sophie Crevecoeur, Susan B Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalia V Ivanova *Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
L Cynthia Watson *Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance Division, Water Science and Technology, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Jérôme ComteWatershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Kyrylo BessonovCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Arusyak AbrahamyanCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Sophie CrevecoeurAquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Susan B WatsonWatershed Hydrology and Ecology Research Division, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmful algal blooms have important implications for the health, functioning, and services of aquatic ecosystems. Our ability to detect and monitor these events is often challenged by the lack of rapid and cost-effective methods to identify bloom-forming organisms and their potential for toxin production. Here, we developed and applied a combination of DNA barcoding and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for the rapid assessment of phytoplankton community composition with a focus on two important indicators of ecosystem health: toxigenic bloom-forming cyanobacteria and impaired planktonic biodiversity. To develop this molecular toolset for identification of cyanobacterial and algal species present in HABs (harmful algal blooms), hereafter called HAB-ID, we achieved three goals: creating a validated reference database, optimizing molecular protocols, and developing original bioinformatics pipeline tailored to uncertainty of algal taxonomy. The BOLD (Barcode of Life Data System) 16S reference database from cultures of 211 cyanobacterial and algal strains representing 102 species with particular focus on bloom and toxin producing taxa was constructed with Sanger sequencing and further refined using Single Molecule Real Time Sequencing (SMRT-sequencing). Using the new reference database of 16S rDNA sequences and constructed mock communities of mixed strains for protocol validation, we developed new NGS primer sets which can recover 16S from both cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algal chloroplasts. We also developed DNA extraction protocols for cultured algal strains and environmental samples, which match commercial kit performance and offer a cost-efficient solution for large scale ecological assessments of harmful blooms while giving benefits of reproducibility and increased accessibility. Our innovative bioinformatics pipeline was designed to handle low taxonomic resolution for problematic genera of cyanobacteria such as the

Indexed as

BiodiversityCyanobacteriaDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHarmful Algal BloomHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhytoplanktonComputational BiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rDNAHarmful algal bloomsNext Generation Sequencing (NGS)Phytoplankton communityReference databaseThe Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD)

Identifiers

PMID41777690
PMCPMC12951889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.