ArticlePeerJ2026
Impact of lower-body strength and power on lunge velocity in elite fencers: a comparative weapon analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the relationship between lower-body strength, power, and lunge velocity in elite female fencers of different weapons (foil, épée, and saber) to analyze the differences in fitness requirements between weapons and to provide a scientific basis for specialized fitness training. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to include 45 female fencers (12 in foil, 16 in saber, and 17 in épée) who performed the isometric mid-thigh pull test (IMTP), countermovement jump, squat jump, drop jump, static lunge velocity and advance lunge velocity tests. A one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences among weapons groups, and Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between lower-body strength, power, and lunge velocity. Results: Épée fencers had significantly higher advance lunge velocity than foil ( Conclusion: Significant differences in lunge performance were found between fencers of different weapons. The results indicate that épée fencers exhibit significantly superior advance lunge velocity compared to foil and saber fencers. Furthermore, foil fencers require greater lower-body strength, and saber fencers rely more on the ability to develop force rapidly. The study supports the development of differentiated physical training programs for each weapon to optimize competitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.