Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777689›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Impact of lower-body strength and power on lunge velocity in elite fencers: a comparative weapon analysis.

Gangrui Chen, Zhongke Gu, Haiping Sun, Yuxuan Qi, Xuelin Qin, Jiansong Dai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gangrui Chen *Sport Science Research Institute, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zhongke Gu *Department of Sports and Health Science, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Haiping SunDepartment of Fencing, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yuxuan QiSchool of Physical Education, Performance and Sport Leadership, Springfield College, Springfield, MA, United States of America.
Xuelin QinSport Science Research Institute, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jiansong DaiDepartment of Sports and Health Science, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the relationship between lower-body strength, power, and lunge velocity in elite female fencers of different weapons (foil, épée, and saber) to analyze the differences in fitness requirements between weapons and to provide a scientific basis for specialized fitness training. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to include 45 female fencers (12 in foil, 16 in saber, and 17 in épée) who performed the isometric mid-thigh pull test (IMTP), countermovement jump, squat jump, drop jump, static lunge velocity and advance lunge velocity tests. A one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences among weapons groups, and Pearson's correlation was used to analyze the relationship between lower-body strength, power, and lunge velocity. Results: Épée fencers had significantly higher advance lunge velocity than foil ( Conclusion: Significant differences in lunge performance were found between fencers of different weapons. The results indicate that épée fencers exhibit significantly superior advance lunge velocity compared to foil and saber fencers. Furthermore, foil fencers require greater lower-body strength, and saber fencers rely more on the ability to develop force rapidly. The study supports the development of differentiated physical training programs for each weapon to optimize competitive performance.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthSportsWeaponsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TestFemaleHumansMuscle, SkeletalPhysical FitnessYoung AdultCountermovement jumpDrop jumpFencingIsometric mid-thigh pullLunge velocitySquat jump

Identifiers

PMID41777689
PMCPMC12951885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.