SynthesisPeerJ2026
Acute and long-term effects of hip thrust training on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The hip thrust (HT) is a popular exercise, but its transfer to athletic performance is debated. We aimed to quantify the acute and long-term effects of HT training on performance. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of six electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. Data from 20 studies assessing the effects of HT training on strength, acceleration, and jump performance were synthesized using random-effects models to calculate pooled Hedges' g effect sizes (ES). Results: Acutely, the HT induced a moderate post-activation performance enhancement on sprinting (ES = 0.55), dependent on protocol ( Conclusions: The HT effectively builds exercise-specific strength, but these gains fail to transfer to squat strength or jumping. Acutely, it offers moderate, protocol-dependent PAPE on sprinting. Long-term, its independent sprint contribution is minimal and borderline-significant (per sensitivity analysis). Based on 'Low' to 'Very Low' evidence certainty, the HT is a valuable complement, not a replacement, for a complete athletic program. Registration: This review was registered on the OSF platform, registration number https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AYFK3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.