ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Advancing access to CAR T-cell therapy: insights and real-world experience from a community oncology practice.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic malignancies, offering durable remissions for patients with otherwise refractory disease. However, access to these therapies remains limited and primarily restricted to academic medical centers, contributing to significant geographic and demographic disparities in care delivery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a community practice-based outpatient CAR T-cell therapy program, independent of academic or hospital affiliation, treating patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies. The implementation process, completed over six months, followed a structured series of steps to ensure safe and effective outpatient administration. Results: Between April 19, 2022, and December 18, 2024, 41 adult patients received outpatient CAR T-cell therapy. Products administered included liso-cel (n=19), ide-cel (n=12), axi-cel (n=8), and brex-cel (n=2). CRS occurred in 68% of patients, and ICANS in 22%. Hospital admission was required for 49% of patients, with 15% needing ICU care. Clinical remission rates at day 100 and 1 year were consistent with published data for each product. Patients receiving 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain CAR T-cells were observed to have numerically lower hospitalization rates (32%) compared to those receiving CD28-based products (100%). No unexpected safety concerns were observed under home-based monitoring. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that outpatient CAR T-cell therapy can be safely delivered in a community oncology practice setting, offering a viable solution to expand access and reduce geographic barriers. Despite clinical success, payer reluctance remains a significant barrier, highlighting the urgent need for policy reform to enable community-based delivery of advanced therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.