Article in Molecular imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Alita Jesal D AlmeidaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis College of Engineering, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3055-3187
Brad A HobsonCenter for Molecular and Genomic Imaging, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California-Davis College of Engineering, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-438X
Logan E SavidgeDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Davis College of Letters and Science, Davis, CA, USA.
Claudia MancaDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Davis College of Letters and Science, Davis, CA, USA.
John P PaulusDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California-Davis Center for Neuroscience, Davis, CA, USA.
Karen L BalesDepartment of Psychology, University of California-Davis College of Letters and Science, Davis, CA, USA.
Abhijit J ChaudhariDepartment of Radiology, University of California-Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4211-1900
Funding
UC Davis CounterACT Center of Excellence: Developing Therapeutic Strategies for Mitigating the Chronic Neurological Consequences of Acute Organophosphate IntoxicationU54NS127758 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HEIKE WULFF · 2022 to 2026
$17.2M
Kappa opioid and oxytocin interactions in social buffering and separationR01MH125411 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BALES, KAREN L. · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
Multimodality PET/CT Scanner for Small Animal ImagingS10OD030440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHAUDHARI, ABHIJIT J · 2022 to 2022
$878k
piPET: A positron emission tomography (PET) scanner for nonhuman primate brain imagingS10OD021715 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHERRY, SIMON R · 2016 to 2016
Purpose: The kappa opioid receptor (KOR) plays a pivotal role in stress- and anxiety-related behaviors, with growing evidence linking it to stress induced by social isolation and separation. Despite this, tools for studying KOR in clinically relevant social contexts remain limited. The socially monogamous coppery titi monkey offers a translational model for investigating pair bonding. This study evaluated the feasibility of [ Methods: Adult titi monkeys (N = 6) underwent [ Results: Baseline [ Conclusions: This study establishes [
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Mapping Kappa Opioid Receptor Binding in Titi Monkeys with [ · full record | OpenQuestion