ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2026
Detection and characterization of physiological network interactions in pulsatile motion of cranial blood vessels using real-time MRI.
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a robust method to assess pulsatile motion of larger cranial blood vessels in the human brain from high spatiotemporal-resolution real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data. Together with percentile-based thresholding in combination with a border-detection algorithm and other empirical selection criteria, we are able to extract area time series from the pulsatile motion of blood vessels. In a proof of concept, we apply our method to the left and right vertebral arteries in a cohort of healthy subjects and extract heart and breathing rates from their pulsatile motion. Comparison to mean physiological reference values measured simultaneously with a photoplethysmogram and a breathing belt shows no differences within the scope of the measurement accuracy. Intra-subject differences for breathing rates detected in the left and right vertebral artery are high but not significant. Our findings suggest that the proposed method is suitable for assessing arterial pulsations in larger cranial vessels driven by heart or breathing rates, as part of the complex physiological network of heart-brain interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.