ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Course of well-being and mental health in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of a national survey within the framework of the COH-FIT study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the mental health of the Swiss population. Methods: This study analyzed data from the Collaborative Outcome study on Health and Functioning during Infection Times (COH-FIT) across three pandemic waves: T1 (April-June 2020), T2 (July-December 2020) or T3 (January-June 2021). Each participant participated only once, during one of these three waves. Participants reported their subjective well-being and mental health status for the two weeks prior to the pandemic (pre-pandemic baseline) and during their respective pandemic wave. Subjective well-being was assessed using the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) from 4,037 participants, while mental health was measured via the P-score, completed by 3,375 participants. The WHO-5 ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better well-being, while the P-score also ranges from 0 to 100 whereas higher scores represent greater levels of perceived burden across five domains of mental health. Pre- and intra-pandemic differences were analyzed using Wilcoxon tests and ANOVA, with subgroup analyses across seven Swiss regions utilizing the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Participants had a mean age of 45.6 years (61.9% female). Results showed a substantial decline in well-being during the pandemic, with average WHO-5 scores decreasing from 75.3 pre-pandemic, to 66.5 during the first wave, 69.1 during the second, and 65.1 during the third, representing relative reductions of 11.7%, 8.2%, and 13.5%. The percentage of participants at risk for depression (WHO-5 <50) peaked during the third wave at 19.8%, up from 10.0% pre-pandemic. Mental health burden, as measured by the P-score, increased significantly during the first wave (from 20.6 to 27.3, +32.5%), and remained elevated across the two subsequent waves, with no significant recovery observed. Wilcoxon tests indicated significant differences between pre-pandemic and intra-pandemic WHO-5 and P-scores, with the largest effect sizes during the third wave ( Discussion: Overall, these findings highlight the considerable and lasting impact of COVID-19 on mental health in Switzerland, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions, particularly in the most affected regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.