ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Integrating machine learning for advanced analysis of bioelectrical impedance parameters in children with nephrotic syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children, characterised kidney-related protein leakage and peripheral oedema, remains challenging to assess. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) provides indices of body water (oedema), and analysis with machine learning (ML) may improve clinical care. We tested an ML model to identify NS in children compared with healthy children. Methods: This cross-sectional study included children with active NS in the acute phase (aNS group) recruited from the Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Anonymised MF-BIA data from frequencies between 5 and 1000 kHz were analysed using the web-based ML platform JustAddDataBio (JADBio)® to identify potential biomarkers for improved diagnosis. Results: Eight children with aNS and 38 healthy children of similar ages were included. The ML software employed ridge logistic regression with the penalty hyperparameter lambda = 0.001 and a selected threshold of 0.81 by JADBio. The best model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72;0.94]. The software selected the following features: height, age, resistance at 50 kHz, impedance at 50 kHz, the characteristic frequency, phase angle at 50 kHz, and sex. The model demonstrated a statistically significant true positive classification rate of 0.92 (92%) [CI: 0.88;0.96] and a specificity of 0.22 (22%) [CI: 0.08;0.36]. Conclusion: Applying ML-supported evaluation of BIA affirmed diagnostics. However, low specificity limits clinical applications. A larger population of patients and inclusion of additional biomarkers may be needed to develop a more acceptable model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.