ArticleVascular health and risk management2026
Accuracy of the Withings BPM Pro 2 (WPM07) Device for Self-Blood Pressure Measurements in the General Populations According to the International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 2:2024) Protocol.
Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurements performed by electronic devices is crucial in clinical practice. International professional societies emphasize the need for rigorous, standardized validation of electronic BP measuring devices to ensure their accuracy and reliability. Objective: This study evaluated the accuracy of the Withings BPM Pro2 (WPM07) upper‑arm oscillometric BP monitor in the adult general population using the ISO 81060‑2:2018/AMD 2:2024 Universal Standard. Methods: Following the ISO same‑arm sequential measurement protocol, 89 eligible pre-selected participants underwent paired test‑device and mercury reference auscultatory measurements. Nine BP measurements were performed on each participant, four with the tested device and five with the auscultatory method. The accuracy of BP measurements was assessed based on the difference between simultaneous measurements taken by two observers and those displayed by the tested device using ISO Criterion 1 (mean and standard deviation of test-reference differences) and Criterion 2 (within‑subject variability of averaged difference values). Results: Eighty-nine participants underwent the BP measurements protocol, data from 87 were analyzed after excluding 2 participants due to excessive BP variability. Inter‑observer agreement for reference measurements was 0.64 ± 2.14 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and 0.39 ± 1.98 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP). ISO criterion 1 was met with mean test-reference differences of 1.0 ± 4.9 mmHg (SBP) and 0.6 ± 4.1 mmHg (DBP) below ISO requirements (≤ 5±8 mmHg). ISO criterion 2 was also satisfied, with within‑subject standard deviations of 3.50 mmHg (SBP) and 3.01 mmHg (DBP), well below the ISO thresholds (≤6.87/6.91 mmHg). Conclusion: The BPM Pro2 (WPM07) fulfills the ISO 81060‑2:2018/AMD 2:2024 accuracy requirements and is suitable for reliable home BP self‑measurement in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.