ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2026
Can Vascular Vertigo Be Recognized by Artificial Intelligence Methods?
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The diversity of underlying causes poses a medical challenge in the differential diagnosis of dizziness. For many patients, the time to reach a diagnosis is quite long and includes several tests. This imposes a significant financial burden on the healthcare system while delaying the recognition and treatment of some neurological emergencies. In this paper, we present a machine learning-based method to aid in the early recognition of vascular causes of vertigo, which require timely management. Methods: Using data such as age, gender, accompanying symptoms, comorbidities, and commonly known blood parameters, a machine learning-based preliminary evaluation method was designed to predict the most appropriate group for the patient. After identifying the effective features using statistical methods, various machine learning methods (decision tree, logistic regression, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble learning methods) were employed to determine dizziness groups. Results: Experimental results present that age, serum albumin, presence of headache, hypertension and diabetes are crucial features to classify vascular vertigo patients.Accuracies range from 81.7% to 86% and the best result is achieved with the logistic regression method. The decision tree, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble methods reached accuracies of 83%, 85.5%, 84%, 81.7%, and 82.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study provides reasonable evidence suggesting that machine learning models may be useful in predicting vascular vertigo cases before hospital admission. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and improve accuracy.Our model may be beneficial for ambulance personnel, practitioners and for the specialists facing atypical and difficult cases of dizziness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.