ArticleQatar medical journal2025
Relevant Condition at Death and customized birthweight centiles for stillbirth classification: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Qatar medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stillbirths (SBs) remain the largest contributor to perinatal mortality, with nearly two-thirds of SBs consistently reported as unexplained. Studies have consistently shown fetal growth restriction (FGR) as a major contributor to SB. Early detection and appropriate management are vital to reducing SB, and the Relevant Condition at Death (ReCoDe) classification utilizes customized birthweight (CBW) centiles to diagnose FGR, decreasing the proportion of SB remaining unclassified. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study to classify SBs using the ReCoDe classification system. A random sample of SBs above 24 weeks' gestational age was included, and relevant clinical, laboratory, and histopathological diagnoses were extracted from medical records. The birthweights were customized according to maternal height, weight, ethnicity, parity, fetal biological sex, andgestational age at diagnosis of SB to obtain CBW centiles. FGR was defined as CBW centiles <10 percentile. Results: The mean age of the 254 women included was 30.5 (standard deviation = 6.2) years, with 17% being <25 years and 9.1% being ≥40 years. The majority were multiparous, 12% grand multiparous. The mean body mass index at booking was 28.6 ± 5.6 kg/m2, with 31% being in the obese category (?30 kg/m2). FGR was the most common diagnosis (52%), followed by maternal diabetes (24.0%), placental abruption (16.5%), other major placental insufficiency (15.4%), lethal congenital anomalies (13.8%), and chorioamnionitis (13.8%). The most common primary diagnosis was FGR (37.0%), followed by congenital anomalies (13.8%), placental abruption (9.1%), and maternal diabetes (6.7%). FGR remained the leading primary diagnosis in non-anomalous babies (43%), with >63% with a secondary diagnosis. The most common secondary diagnosis associated with FGR was other placental insufficiency (23.4%), followed by abruption and maternal conditions. After applying the classification system, only 18 cases remained unclassified (7.1%). Conclusions: Applying the ReCoDe classification with CBW centiles, we were able to classify most of our SBs, with only 7.1% remaining unclassified. Appropriate classification of SB is vital for understanding what went wrong, counselling bereaved families, planning future pregnancies, and improving perinatal care. Early identification of FGR will allow appropriate monitoring and timely delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.