Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777467›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Pain as Lived Experience: Philosophical Perspectives in Pain Medicine - A Narrative Review.

Dong Ah Shin, Min Cheol Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dong Ah ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Cheol ChangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7629-7213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a prevalent clinical complaint that often defies explanation within conventional biomedical frameworks, particularly in chronic and idiopathic conditions, frequently leading to patient invalidation and inadequate care. We evaluate the potential of philosophy to expand the understanding of pain beyond biological reductionism by conceptualizing pain as a lived experience. This narrative review aims to integrate key philosophical perspectives with contemporary pain medicine and to examine their relevance for clinical practice. A narrative review of philosophical and medical literature was conducted, focusing on phenomenology, existential philosophy, philosophy of language, biopolitics, and neurophilosophy. These frameworks conceptualize pain as a disruption of embodied existence, a challenge to identity and autonomy, a phenomenon that resists full linguistic expression, a condition shaped by institutional and sociopolitical structures, and an inferential process influenced by prior experience and context. Together, these perspectives suggest that effective pain management requires more than symptom reduction and objective measurement. Attending to patients' lived experiences may strengthen therapeutic alliances, enhance clinical communication, and support more ethical, person-centered, and clinically meaningful approaches to pain care.

Indexed as

biopoliticsexistential philosophymedicineneurophilosophypainphenomenology

Identifiers

PMID41777467
PMCPMC12951854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.