ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026
The Effects of the Abdominal Drawing-In Maneuver on Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Torque During Trunk Rotation.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) is widely used in sports physical therapy and rehabilitation to selectively activate deep trunk muscles. Although the ADIM is effective for motor control retraining, previous studies suggest that it may be unsuitable as a breathing strategy during high-load tasks because it limits intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) generation. Trunk rotation in the horizontal plane is a fundamental component of many functional and sport-related movements and requires coordinated trunk stability and force production; however, the effects of the ADIM on IAP and torque during trunk rotation remain unclear. Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to clarify the effects of the ADIM on IAP and trunk rotational torque during trunk rotation. Study Design: Crossover, randomized controlled study. Methods: Fifteen healthy young adult males performed seated isometric trunk rotation tasks under two conditions: spontaneous rotation (SR) and trunk rotation with the ADIM (DIR). IAP was measured using a catheter-type pressure sensor. Trunk rotational torque was measured with a custom-manufactured trunk rotation dynamometer. Inspiratory volume was normalized as %inspiratory volume. Outcomes were compared between conditions. Results: IAP was significantly greater in SR (96.7 ± 31.4 mmHg) than in DIR (34.9 ± 15.9 mmHg) (p < 0.01, d = 2.48). Torque was also significantly greater in SR (68.7 ± 20.2 Nm) than in DIR (49.1 ± 17.7 Nm) (p < 0.01, d = 1.03). %inspiratory volume was significantly greater in SR (66.9 ± 16.2%) compared with DIR (26.4 ± 17.4%) (p < 0.01, d = 2.41). Large effect sizes were observed for all outcomes. Conclusion: Performing trunk rotation with the ADIM attenuated increases in IAP and trunk rotational torque. These findings indicate that ADIM influences both pressure generation and mechanical output during trunk rotation. Level of Evidence: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.