Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Praxeological analysis (PA/CPA) for stigma, health inequalities, and coercion in women's services.

Phil Hutchinson, Loreen Chikwira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phil HutchinsonSchool of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Loreen ChikwiraThe King's Fund, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper sets out a practical, interview-free protocol for studying how stigma, inequalities, and restrictive practices are done in women's mental health, learning-disability, and autism services, with a particular focus on women detained in inpatient and other institutional settings. Building on Praxeological Analysis (PA) and Critical Praxeological Analysis (CPA), we specify data pathways for naturally occurring materials (clinical letters, triage logs, ward round notes, safeguarding records, complaint correspondence, public hearings/transcripts, and, where ethically approved, audio/video recordings of clinical interactions between people who use services and healthcare professionals), and a replicable analytic procedure keyed to linguistic/praxeological Gestalts. Rather than treating "stigma" as an attitude, attribute or variable, we investigate stigma in its sites of production, the situations in which discrimination, discreditation, degradation etc are done, experienced and witnessable. The protocol operationalizes what we call a praxeological respecification: a shift from traits to scenes and from beliefs and attitudes to practices, enabling research and quality improvement that directly addresses the levers through which inequalities are produced and maintained and which supports least-restrictive, trauma-informed, autism-informed and culturally competent inpatient care in line with current NHS culture-of-care standards.

Indexed as

coercion and restraintCritical Praxeological Analysis (CPA)culture of carePraxeological Analysis (PA)restrictive practicesstigma in healthcaretrauma-informed carewomen’s mental health

Identifiers

PMID41777344
PMCPMC12950706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.