ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
A novel polysaccharide hemostatic agent in prevention of post-procedural bleeding following large colonic polyp resection.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Preventing post-procedural bleeding (PPB) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is crucial for minimizing post-endoscopic complications. We aimed to evaluate the rate of PPB in large colorectal lesions removed via EMR or ESD, followed by application of a resorbable plant-based hemostatic powder (HaemoCer PLUS). Patients and methods: This prospective pilot study was conducted at three tertiary care centers from November 2021 to February 2024. HaemoCer PLUS was applied at the end of the procedure and spread over the post-resection surface. No endoscopic clips were used after resection. Results: The study included 50 patients with a mean lesion diameter of 52.28 mm (standard deviation 18.29 mm). Fifty-six percent of the polyps were in the rectum and 86% were classified as adenomas. ESD was used to remove 20 lesions, hybrid ESD for eight, Hot-EMR for 17, and cold-EMR for five. All patients received HaemoCer PLUS application for PPB prevention. Delayed bleeding was observed in 6% of cases, including one case of ESD and two cases of hot-snare resection. PPB occurred 24 hours after the procedure and no bleeding cases were reported more than 30 days post-endoscopy. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant associations between post-procedural bleeding and lesion size, patient age, or endoscopic resection technique. Conclusions: Use of a novel resorbable plant-based hemostatic powder could be a beneficial method for reducing delayed bleeding complications, particularly in high-risk groups characterized by specific lesions and patient factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.