ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Preset pursestring procedure: Innovative auxiliary method of endoscopic full-thickness resection in small gastric stromal tumors.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) of gastric stromal tumors carries a high peritonitis risk. Our case report implied the preset pursestring procedure (PPP) could boost EFR speed and safety, but supporting clinical evidence is lacking, prompting this clinical evaluation of PPP in gastric EFR. Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed adults with small gastric stromal tumors who underwent EFR (n = 31) or PPP-assisted EFR (PPP-EFR, n = 28) between August 2022 and August 2023. Tumor characteristics, adverse events, postoperative efficacy, economic outcomes, and follow-up data were compared between groups. Results: R0 resection rates were comparable (PPP-EFR: 92.8%; EFR: 90.0%). PPP-EFR had shorter closure time (3.5 vs. 19.5 min, Conclusions: PPP optimizes EFR closure, reduces inflammatory and abdominal complications, and improves postoperative recovery for small gastric stromal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.