ReviewSports medicine international open2026
The interplay between muscle length, range of motion, and exercise selection: a review.
Review in Sports medicine international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that training at longer muscle lengths may optimize muscle hypertrophy. Of note, there is an interplay between muscle length, range of motion (ROM), and exercise selection. It is difficult to identify whether muscle length per se is the main factor, limiting the ability to draw practical conclusions. Thus, synthesizing these different lines of investigation may help to clarify this topic. Firstly, we offer a comprehensive understanding of the physiological effects arising from muscle contractions in longer, moderate, and shorter muscle lengths. Subsequently, we conducted an unstructured review of long-term studies comparing muscle hypertrophy following: 1) isometric training at different muscle lengths, 2) training with different ROMs, and 3) exercises that train muscles at different muscle lengths and/or with different resistance profiles. Different lines of investigation suggest that muscle length plays a role, as training at longer muscle lengths elicits more favorable muscle growth. Notably, the greater muscle growth often observed after exercises and ROMs that train muscles at longer lengths occurs when there is a relevant external torque in the lengthened position. From a practical perspective, the selection of exercises and ROMs that impose relevant external torque at longer muscle lengths should be considered to optimize muscle growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.