Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777276›Full record

ReviewSports medicine international open2026

The interplay between muscle length, range of motion, and exercise selection: a review.

Gustavo Ferreira Pedrosa, Mariano Rezende Pereira, Witalo Kassiano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gustavo Ferreira PedrosaResearch Group Applied to Strength Training (GPATF), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Mariano Rezende PereiraSports Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Witalo KassianoMetabolism, Nutrition, and Exercise Laboratory. Physical Education and Sport Center, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that training at longer muscle lengths may optimize muscle hypertrophy. Of note, there is an interplay between muscle length, range of motion (ROM), and exercise selection. It is difficult to identify whether muscle length per se is the main factor, limiting the ability to draw practical conclusions. Thus, synthesizing these different lines of investigation may help to clarify this topic. Firstly, we offer a comprehensive understanding of the physiological effects arising from muscle contractions in longer, moderate, and shorter muscle lengths. Subsequently, we conducted an unstructured review of long-term studies comparing muscle hypertrophy following: 1) isometric training at different muscle lengths, 2) training with different ROMs, and 3) exercises that train muscles at different muscle lengths and/or with different resistance profiles. Different lines of investigation suggest that muscle length plays a role, as training at longer muscle lengths elicits more favorable muscle growth. Notably, the greater muscle growth often observed after exercises and ROMs that train muscles at longer lengths occurs when there is a relevant external torque in the lengthened position. From a practical perspective, the selection of exercises and ROMs that impose relevant external torque at longer muscle lengths should be considered to optimize muscle growth.

Indexed as

mechanical stressmuscle hypertrophymuscle lengthrange of motion

Identifiers

PMID41777276
PMCPMC12951042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.