ArticleInternational journal of psychological research
An explanation of social conflict? social class and moral foundations. Three meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of psychological research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A qualitative study on incentive failure for college students in volunteer teaching programs.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although morality can play an important role in explaining the recent rise of social conflicts inside and outside the Western countries, the study of moral differences between social classes and their possible influence on these social conflicts has been very limited. Thus, this article, which relies on the Moral Foundations Theory, investigates, from a meta-analytic point of view, the relationship of social class (or social ladder, measured as education level, income, and socioeconomic status), and moral foundations, and its possible role as predictor of social conflict. 41 studies (k = 86; N = 285,461), for education level, 26 studies (k = 34; N = 23,889) for income, and 5 studies (k = 16; N = 81,327) for socioeconomic status, were selected. Results showed how all pooled correlations are either statistically not different from zero or of negligible size. Limitations regarding a restrictive range of available data, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.