Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777252›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychological research

The Role of Autonomy in Defining Work Arrangements and Its Effect on Psychological Safety.

Milena da Silva-Guimaraes, Pedro Fialho, Carolina Moliner, Monique Delfim-Andrade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychological research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milena da Silva-GuimaraesUniversitat de Valencia. Valencia, España. Universitat de Valencia Universitat de Valencia Valencia Spain.
Pedro FialhoUniversidade de Coimbra. Coimbra, Portugal. Universidade de Coimbra Universidade de Coimbra Coimbra Portugal.
Carolina MolinerUniversitat de Valencia. Valencia, España. Universitat de Valencia Universitat de Valencia Valencia Spain.
Monique Delfim-AndradeUniversidade de Coimbra. Coimbra, Portugal. Universidade de Coimbra Universidade de Coimbra Coimbra Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the interaction between work arrangements (in- person, remote, or hybrid) and autonomy in defining this arrangement on perceived psychological safety in Brazilian workers (N = 506; 300 women, 206 men). This study adopted a cross-sectional design, data were collected in a non-probabilistic convenience sampling, the measures used were psychological safety, working arrangements and autonomy. The analyses included independent samples t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The findings indicated that psychological safety increased with virtuality levels. Interestingly, when companies choose to implement remote and hybrid work arrangements, employees felt more psychologically safe than when they chose to do so voluntarily. This research suggests that organizations committed to remote work arrangements promote the perceived psychological safety of their workers. Employees may feel that, by establishing a telework arrangement, the organization demonstrates trustworthy behavior toward them.

Indexed as

hybrid workin-person workPsychological Safetyteleworkingworking arrangement

Identifiers

PMID41777252
PMCPMC12863978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.