ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Rare Localized Adverse Reaction to Botulinum Toxin Type A in a Patient Without Allergic History: A Case Report.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Unusual Iatrogenic Complication of Botulinum Toxin: Forearm Flexor Weakness Following a Nonstandard Intradermal Sensitivity Test.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Response by Chirumbolo to "Rare Localized Adverse Reaction to Botulinum Toxin Type A in a Patient Without Allergic History: A Case Report" by Muner et al.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin type A is widely used in aesthetic and therapeutic medicine and is considered safe. Nonetheless, rare adverse reactions can occur, even in patients with no previous allergic history. The authors report the case of a 50-year-old woman who developed a localized inflammatory reaction characterized by erythema, edema, vesicles, burning, and pruritus following injections in the upper face. A reactivity test with another formulation in the subcutaneous tissue of the arm produced an even more severe response, suggesting greater immune reactivity in subcutaneous tissue compared with muscle. Considering the known differences among commercial formulations, including accessory proteins and stabilizers, the test excluded the hypothesis of an allergy specific to a single brand. Standard therapies with corticosteroids and antibiotics failed to produce improvement, whereas ozone therapy led to significant recovery. This case emphasizes the importance of individualized follow-up and highlights the need for further studies to elucidate the immunopathological mechanisms underlying such rare hypersensitivity reactions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.