ArticleHealth science reports2026
Impacts of Competitive a Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiatives Small Grant Award on Junior Faculty Researchers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Many organizations worldwide have made significant financial commitments to fund research across various sectors. However, there has been little study on the performance of these awards, particularly in underdeveloped countries. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the immediate impacts of the Competitive Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative (HEPI) Small Grant Award on junior faculty researchers. Methods: An institutional-based concurrent mixed-method study was conducted from October 2023 to April 2024 at Addis Ababa, Dilla, and Wolaita Sodo Universities. The study included 131 applicants (40 awardees and 91 non-awardees) over 5 years. Quantitative data were collected using a pre-tested, semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire via Google Drive and directly exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were followed by appropriate independent Results: Quantitative results demonstrated that the only variable that differed significantly between awardees and non-awardees was the number of works presented at conferences after HEPI small grant applications. From a qualitative perspective, generally positive qualitative impacts were found to have been made by the grant on junior faculty researchers in the areas of career and professional development, enhancing research capacity, contributing to the community and policy, fostering collaboration with researchers and different universities, enhancing interdisciplinary work and sustainability of education, and disseminating the grant output. Conclusions: According to quantitative and qualitative findings, the Competitive HEPI Small Grant Award had varying impacts on junior faculty researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.